|
|
Registros recuperados : 13 | |
2. | | MACEDO, I.; ROEL, A.; AYALA, W.; PRAVIA, V.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C.M. 207-4. Rice rotations affect soil organic carbon sequestration and rice yield in a temperate region of South America. [Abstract] Soil Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Community. ASA Section: Environmental Quality. In: ASA, CSSA, SSSA International Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT. 2021. https://scisoc.confex.com/scisoc/2021am/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/134305 Abstract citation: Macedo, I., Roel, A., Ayala, W., Pravia, M. V., Terra, J. A., & Pittelkow, C. M. (2021). Rice Rotations Affect Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration and Rice Yield in a Temperate Region of South America [Abstract]....Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
3. | | MACEDO, I.; ROEL, A.; VELAZCO, J.I.; BORDAGORRI, A.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C.M. Intensification of rice-pasture rotations with annual crops reduces the stability of sustainability across productivity, economic, and environmental indicators. Agricultural Systems, October 2022, volume 202, Article Number 103488. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103488 Article history: Received 6 May 2022, Revised 17 August 2022, Accepted 19 August 2022, Available online 30 August 2022, Version of Record 30 August 2022.Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
5. | | ZHANG, Z.; MACEDO, I.; LINQUIST, B.A.; SANDER, B. O.; PITTELKOW, C.M. Opportunities for mitigating net system greenhouse gas emissions in Southeast Asian rice production: A systematic review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2024, Volume 361, article 108812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108812 Article history: Received 28 June 2023; Received in revised form 13 September 2023; Accepted 8 November 2023; Available online 21 November 2023. -- Correspondence: Z. Zhang, E-mail address: hcizhang@ucdavis.edu --Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
6. | | MACEDO, I.; PITTELKOW, C.M.; TERRA, J.A.; CASTILLO, J.; ROEL, A. The power of on-farm data for improved agronomy. Global Food Security. 2024, Volume 40, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100752 -- OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received 24 November 2023, Revised 27 February 2024, Accepted 3 March 2024, Available online 16 March 2024, Version of Record 16 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Macedo, I.; Department of Plant Sciences, Univ. of...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
7. | | TSENG, C-M.; ROEL, A.; MACEDO, I.; MARELLA, M.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C. M. Synergies and tradeoffs among yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint indicators in rice systems. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021, volume 3, 100070. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070 Article history: Received 30 April 2021 / / Revised 12 July 2021 // Accepted 13 July 2021 // Available online 24 July 2021.Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
8. | | TSENG, M.C.; ROEL, A.; MARELLA, M.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C.M. Assessment of yield gaps using field-level data in Uruguay. [Abstract]. In: International Temperate Rice Conference (7., 2020, Pelotas, RS), Science & Innovation: feeding a world of 10 billion people: proceedings. Pelotas RS, Brasil, February 9-12, 2020. Brasília, DF : Embrapa, 2020.Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
9. | | TSENG, M.C.; ROEL, A.; MACEDO, I.; MARELLA, M.; TERRA, J.A.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; PITTELKOW, C. M. Field-level factors for closing yield gaps in high-yielding rice systems of Uruguay. Field Crops Research, February 2021, vol. 264, no. 108097. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108097 12 p. Article history: Received 9 April 2020 / Received in revised form 12 January 2021 / Accepted 5 February 2021 / Available online 24 February 2021.Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
10. | | PITTELKOW, C.M.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; TERRA, J.A.; RICCETTO, S.; MACEDO, I.; BONILLA, C.; ROEL, A. Sustainability of rice intensification in Uruguay from 1993 to 2013. Global Food Security, 2016, v. 9, p. 10-18. Article history: Received 2 February 2016, Received in revised form 4 May 2016, Accepted 6 May 2016.
Have a Supplementary materialBiblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
11. | | PITTELKOW, C.M.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; TERRA, J.A.; RICCETTO, S.; MACEDO, I.; BONILLA, C.; ROEL, A. Sostenibilidad de la intensificación arrocera en el Uruguay desde 1993 al 2013. ln: JORNADA ANUAL ARROZ, 2016, INIA TREINTA Y TRES, TREINTA Y TRES, UY. Arroz: resultados experimentales 2015-2016. Treinta y Tres, (Uruguay): INIA, 2016. cap. 4, p. 7-10. (Serie Actividades de Difusión; 765) Acceso a la presentación oral del trabajo A. Roel.Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
12. | | ROEL, A.; TERRA, J.A.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; MARELLA, M.; TSENG, M.C.; PITTELKOW, C.M. Rice productivity and resource use efficiencies in Uruguay. [Abstract]. In: International Temperate Rice Conference (7., 2020, Pelotas, RS), Science & Innovation: feeding a world of 10 billion people: proceedings. Pelotas RS, Brasil, February 9-12, 2020. Brasília, DF : Embrapa, 2020.Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 13 | |
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
12/12/2023 |
Actualizado : |
12/12/2023 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
ZHANG, Z.; MACEDO, I.; LINQUIST, B.A.; SANDER, B. O.; PITTELKOW, C.M. |
Afiliación : |
ZHENGLIN ZHANG, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, 95616, CA, United States; IGNACIO MACEDO YAPOR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, 95616, CA, United State; BRUCE A. LINQUIST, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, 95616, CA, United States; BJOERN OLE SANDER, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Pili Drive, Laguna, Los Baños, 4031, Philippines; CAMERON M. PITTELKOW, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, 95616, CA, United States. |
Título : |
Opportunities for mitigating net system greenhouse gas emissions in Southeast Asian rice production: A systematic review. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2024, Volume 361, article 108812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108812 |
ISSN : |
0167-8809 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.agee.2023.108812 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 28 June 2023; Received in revised form 13 September 2023; Accepted 8 November 2023; Available online 21 November 2023. -- Correspondence: Z. Zhang, E-mail address: hcizhang@ucdavis.edu -- |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Southeast Asia (SEA) is a key producer and exporter of rice, accounting for around 28% of rice produced globally. To effectively mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in SEA rice systems, field methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions have been intensively studied. However, an integrated assessment of system-level GHG emissions which includes other carbon (C) balance components, such as soil organic carbon (SOC) or energy use, that can positively or negatively influence the net capacity for climate change mitigation is lacking. We conducted a systematic review of published research in SEA rice systems to synthesize findings across four main components of net system emissions: (1) field GHG emissions, (2) energy inputs, (3) residue utilization beyond the field, and (4) SOC change. The objectives were to highlight effective mitigation opportunities and explore cross-component effects to identify tradeoffs and key knowledge gaps. Field GHG emissions were the largest contributor to net system emissions in agreement with existing scientific consensus, with results showing that practices such as floodwater drainage and residue removal are sound options for CH4 mitigation. On the other hand, increasing SOC potentially provides a large GHG mitigation opportunity, with long-term continuous rice cropping and practices such as residue incorporation and biochar application promoting SOC increase. A reduction in energy inputs was mainly achieved by optimizing agrochemical use, especially N fertilizers. For residue utilization beyond the field, GHG emission mitigation mainly came from preventing open field burning through residue removal. Removed residue can subsequently be used for producing energy that offsets GHG emissions associated with conventional fuel sources (e.g. fossil fuel-based electricity generation) or substituting material used in other production systems. Integrating all four components of net system emissions into one analysis underscores the following two main takeaways. First, the components of field GHG emissions and SOC change are the biggest opportunities for reducing net system emissions and need to be considered for effective climate change mitigation. Second, the reduction of C inputs through residue removal and increased soil aeration through multiple drainage will lower CH4 emissions but may also potentially decrease SOC stocks over time. Hence, we argue that future research needs to consider cross-component effects to optimize net system emissions, specifically the "stacking" of best management practices for mitigation related to field GHG emissions or SOC change in long-term experiments. © 2023 The Authors MenosABSTRACT.- Southeast Asia (SEA) is a key producer and exporter of rice, accounting for around 28% of rice produced globally. To effectively mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in SEA rice systems, field methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions have been intensively studied. However, an integrated assessment of system-level GHG emissions which includes other carbon (C) balance components, such as soil organic carbon (SOC) or energy use, that can positively or negatively influence the net capacity for climate change mitigation is lacking. We conducted a systematic review of published research in SEA rice systems to synthesize findings across four main components of net system emissions: (1) field GHG emissions, (2) energy inputs, (3) residue utilization beyond the field, and (4) SOC change. The objectives were to highlight effective mitigation opportunities and explore cross-component effects to identify tradeoffs and key knowledge gaps. Field GHG emissions were the largest contributor to net system emissions in agreement with existing scientific consensus, with results showing that practices such as floodwater drainage and residue removal are sound options for CH4 mitigation. On the other hand, increasing SOC potentially provides a large GHG mitigation opportunity, with long-term continuous rice cropping and practices such as residue incorporation and biochar application promoting SOC increase. A reduction in energy inputs was mainly achieved by optimizing agrochem... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Climate smart agriculture; Energy input; GHG emissions; Greenhouse gas; Residue and water management; Soil organic carbon. |
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
Marc : |
LEADER 03809naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1064401 005 2023-12-12 008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0167-8809 024 7 $a10.1016/j.agee.2023.108812$2DOI 100 1 $aZHANG, Z. 245 $aOpportunities for mitigating net system greenhouse gas emissions in Southeast Asian rice production$bA systematic review.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2023 500 $aArticle history: Received 28 June 2023; Received in revised form 13 September 2023; Accepted 8 November 2023; Available online 21 November 2023. -- Correspondence: Z. Zhang, E-mail address: hcizhang@ucdavis.edu -- 520 $aABSTRACT.- Southeast Asia (SEA) is a key producer and exporter of rice, accounting for around 28% of rice produced globally. To effectively mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in SEA rice systems, field methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions have been intensively studied. However, an integrated assessment of system-level GHG emissions which includes other carbon (C) balance components, such as soil organic carbon (SOC) or energy use, that can positively or negatively influence the net capacity for climate change mitigation is lacking. We conducted a systematic review of published research in SEA rice systems to synthesize findings across four main components of net system emissions: (1) field GHG emissions, (2) energy inputs, (3) residue utilization beyond the field, and (4) SOC change. The objectives were to highlight effective mitigation opportunities and explore cross-component effects to identify tradeoffs and key knowledge gaps. Field GHG emissions were the largest contributor to net system emissions in agreement with existing scientific consensus, with results showing that practices such as floodwater drainage and residue removal are sound options for CH4 mitigation. On the other hand, increasing SOC potentially provides a large GHG mitigation opportunity, with long-term continuous rice cropping and practices such as residue incorporation and biochar application promoting SOC increase. A reduction in energy inputs was mainly achieved by optimizing agrochemical use, especially N fertilizers. For residue utilization beyond the field, GHG emission mitigation mainly came from preventing open field burning through residue removal. Removed residue can subsequently be used for producing energy that offsets GHG emissions associated with conventional fuel sources (e.g. fossil fuel-based electricity generation) or substituting material used in other production systems. Integrating all four components of net system emissions into one analysis underscores the following two main takeaways. First, the components of field GHG emissions and SOC change are the biggest opportunities for reducing net system emissions and need to be considered for effective climate change mitigation. Second, the reduction of C inputs through residue removal and increased soil aeration through multiple drainage will lower CH4 emissions but may also potentially decrease SOC stocks over time. Hence, we argue that future research needs to consider cross-component effects to optimize net system emissions, specifically the "stacking" of best management practices for mitigation related to field GHG emissions or SOC change in long-term experiments. © 2023 The Authors 653 $aClimate smart agriculture 653 $aEnergy input 653 $aGHG emissions 653 $aGreenhouse gas 653 $aResidue and water management 653 $aSoil organic carbon 700 1 $aMACEDO, I. 700 1 $aLINQUIST, B.A. 700 1 $aSANDER, B. O. 700 1 $aPITTELKOW, C.M. 773 $tAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2024, Volume 361, article 108812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108812
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|